
06-05-2008, 11:18 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,058
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NAT
In the natural sciences, abiogenesis, the question of the origin of life, is the study of how life on Earth emerged from non-life. Scientific consensus is that abiogenesis occurred sometime between 4.4 billion years ago, when water vapor first liquefied,[2] and 2.7 billion years ago, when the ratio of stable isotopes of carbon (12C and 13C), iron (56Fe, 57Fe, and 58Fe) and sulfur (32S, 33S, 34S, and 36S) points to a biogenic origin of minerals and sediments[3][4] and molecular biomarkers indicate photosynthesis.[5][6] This topic also includes panspermia and other exogenic theories regarding possible extra-planetary or extraterrestrial origins of life.[7]
Abiogenesis is a limited field of research despite its profound impact on biology and human understanding of the natural world. Progress in this field is generally slow and sporadic, though it still draws the attention of many due to the eminence of the question being investigated. Several hypotheses have been proposed, most notably the iron-sulfur world theory (metabolism first) and the RNA world hypothesis (genetics first).[8]
Abiogenesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Read to your heart's content.
There are plenty of other sources on the net as well.
Keep in mind, merely becasue we are currently having some small difficulty in providing concrete proof, we are talking millions of eyars after all, doesn;t automatically open the door for the Big Spooky Guy.
|
I know what it is, thanks anyhow.
Scientific consensus? What about scientific truth? Problem with their (your?) consensus is that something still can't come from nothing. Until it is shown otherwise it is philosophy, not science. Sorry, but unfortunately you are indeed referring to "philosophy of science" rather than science.
|