Originally Posted by Tileman

Mulp is so shallow he likes to look at 2 things:
1. Bottom price that is easily published and promoted via prominant sources.
2. Refusal to separate an apple and an orange when comparing the two.


Mulp, rather than make the claim the swiss system is better than our own, please specify exactly WHAT they did to make it better. What inside thier system needs to be removed or added to our own to make it equal or better. Furthermore, places like CUBA (who you called a capitalist healthcare system) need to be compared to FRANCE and figure out why one is better.

Mulp, you cannot look at the bottom dollar and make a judgment until you understand how that dollar figure is possible. You seem oblivious that, to cut ourselves down to their level of average expense is NOT government impliments but in fact CUTS inside the private sector and many of which are already government regulated ergo keeping the prices high where capitalism would allow prices to drop!

In case my last paragraph confused you let me put it into lamens terminology. The government already plays a HUGE INFLUENCE on what our healthcare costs! You think adding even more government would lower it while most economists would agree the reverse is true. Capitalism has always proved the best product or service at the lowest price when government leaves it alone, with the only exception being MONOPOLIES......