View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008, 01:00 AM
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
"NASA's press office "marginalized or mischaracterized" studies on global warming between 2004 and 2006, the agency's own internal watchdog concluded.

In a report released Monday, NASA's inspector general office called it "inappropriate political interference" by political appointees in the press office. It said the agency's top management wasn't part of the censorship, nor were career officials"


Watchdog: NASA misled on global warming studies - CNN.com
I am not sure you realize the Inspector General is criticizing political appointees of the Bush administration (many of whom were oil industry hacks) who tried to stifle peer reviewed science that was to be released.

Your article reveals how this adminstrations political appointees were allowed to stifle or even change scientists peer reviewed studies who were not trying to achieve any result ,but to find the truth. The oil hacks appointed by the Bush administration did not like the results of many of the peer reviewed scientific studies.

This article does not help support the cause you are promoting to ignore the worlds leading scientists and promote the oil industries promotion of ignoring science and using catch phrases like globaloney. You might try some oil industry journals to find articles to promote your cause. This article does the opposite.
Reply With Quote