
05-30-2008, 03:33 AM
|
|
Political Guru
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 903
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suburbanite
I've only read one book by Kierkegaard in which he retold the story of Abraham and Issac and the slaying of the Ram (or sheep or whatever). He retells the story emphasizing the personal existential dilemma of the two characters, Issac knowing his father intends to murder him, Abraham knowing he is going to slay his most cherished son.
The idea, or how it would work, and bear with me this is a recent and loosely formed idea. Basically, if one could realize that the "Bible story" was a contingent piece of fiction and yet also believe that in virtue of believing in it that you will reap some sort of benefit. Its the same as an Atheist and a good book he is reading. He will realize, the book is but a book, contingent, contextual, et al. However, he can still chose to learn from it, in fact, he can even chose to devote his entire like to a book. What if that book was the Bible?
|
...and this is where I wish I had a better grasp of Bayesian epistemology because I'm certain it applies to this. I do believe there is a difference between drawing a lesson from a text and actually believing it. We know fairy tales that teach us lessons but we do not believe them. However, I will not offer any support for this opinion tonight. Perhaps at a latter date.
__________________
"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." Alexander Hamilton
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
Plato
|