Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp
You aren't being honest about "your science" so let me quote "your scientific truth" to you:
|
You really don't seem very bright. Do you have a problem reading words and understanding what they say? Let me see if I can explain what I said to you. Unfortunately, there isn't a crayon feature on this board, so I can't draw you a picture, but I will see if I can get down to your intellectual level.
I said:
"Those who use "birth control" pills with abortifacient properties might not be aware that they could be aborting their children and killing without intent is manslaugher. Murder is one human being killing another human being with intent. Can you offer up any credible evidence that killing an unborn at any stage is not killing a living human being and therefore prove that abortion or "birth control" methods with abortaficient properties does not deny a living human being the right to live?"
OK, are you ready? Lets see if we can get you to a point where you can understand what I wrote. In the first sentence (the one in red) I clearly state that if those who are using birth control pills (perhaps I should have said methods) that have abortifacient properties (that means they cause abortion) but aren't aware of the fact that they have abortifacient properties can't be commiting murder because murder is one human being killing another with intent. If they aren't aware of the abortifacient properties of their method of birth control, then by definition they are not commiting murder but are commiting manslaughter.
In the second sentence, I point out that murder is one human being killing another human being with intent in an effort to point out the difference between manslaugher and murder. Clearly, you didn't get it.
The rest is asking you to provide some evidence that unborns are not human beings. Do you understand?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp
So, your "scientific truth" "proves" that at least a billion women are murders and that hundreds of million women are annually murdering a billion human beings.
|
Murder or manslaugher. Murder requires intent. If a woman uses a birth control method and is aware of an abortifacient quality, then what else could you possibly call one human being killing another with intent?
And what a truth proves is irrelavent to the fact that it is a truth. Again, you are making a logical fallacy in the assumption that because a great number of people do a thing that said thing becomes OK because of the numbers without regard to the facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp
So, until you provide "scientific proof" that an embryo in a petri dish or frozen in liquid nitrogen or inside a woman isn't a human being, then you are stuck with claiming that most of the people of the world support killing human beings by the billions.
|
When did I ever claim otherwise? As I said, those who aren't aware of the abortifacient qualities of their method of birth control aren't killing with intent so they would be guilty of manslaughter.
Am I going to have to explain every single thing that I say to you? If you have a reading impediment, just say so and I will take greater pains to try and explain what I am saying in simpler terms.