Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho
3 is dead wrong, they have witnessed starts being born. You can look up some pictures on the internet.
The other questions even science will admit is currently non-defined. They have some very good guesses that have stood up to examination to date, however I would not say that they are settled.
But something being unknown doesn't make it unknowable. Science has filled in large swathes of the unknown territory in the last 150 years, and it is not too far to assume they will continue to do so in the future. There is some good physics work going on concerning gravity, that we hope will be solved once CERN gets their new accelerator fully functioning.
|
Please show me the star that was born...that never existed, and do not point out the example of the "Orion Nebula", as this is far from being a star...it is "ONLY THEORIZED" as being the beginning of star. As the math "proves" one star should be exampled "breaking water" every 7 minutes, all one should have to do is "look up", as the LIGHT from those very distant stars of the past should still be "observable" even today, as the observable universe is theorized to be some 93 billion light years across. I am easy to get along with, just produce your "proof", of just ONE STAR that has been witnessed coming into existence. You have answered NONE of the questions, yet you are to PROUD to admit that you simply do not know, thus you continue to present "pseudo intellect" and expect this to be a valid display of intelligence. I for one can not answer these simple basic questions...and apparently you can not either, yet you expect us to simply accept THEORY AS FACT? BD