Quote:
Originally Posted by Suburbanite
Both of these attempts suffer not from their inconsistencies within metaphysics but because they are by nature metaphysical answers. Metaphysics, the understanding of what is real, of what is substantial is a linguistic tool used to help human being cope with their environment. Our metaphysical understanding of space will only grow as we need to understand it better. Your critique and the initial absurdities of the Big Bang theory are not disproofs of our ability to acquire more information and realize more patterns. Instead, they only assert a flaw in the assertion of any metaphysical TRUTH. Instead, to set the philosophical paradigm up so that metaphysics were dedivinized and reduced to the functionality of a simple and limited tool.
|
You seem to be "intelligent", or you present the verbose language of the pseudo intelligent that wishes "others" to accept their self professed example of intelligence. Just answer these simple questions in the empirical scientific method...without the speculation of theory, and I will bend a knee to your verbose display of Mr. Websters dictionary. They are really quite simple one word questions just explain each in the actual field of science provided with factual knowledge. Please explain 1.) "GRAVITY"...not the characteristics of gravity but gravity. 2.) Life and the force that brings "animation" to a lump of inert matter known as the BODY HUMAN...again, not the characteristics of life but LIFE..its origins, its evolution..etc, and of course NO THEORIES please. 3.) A "STAR".....Please explain the birth of a star, without theory, present the evidence of a NEW STAR being born, show me a star that exists now that was not evident in history. 4.) Please explain just how the Universe can be "observed" being 93 billion light years across, and yet only be 13.7 billion years old...again, no theories, that can be pasted....tell us in "your own words". Show us just how intelligent you, do not OPINE about how smart you are. BD