View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 01:55 PM
Suburbanite Suburbanite is offline
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog View Post
No of course not...The Big Bang was a product of "Magic", as the materials (mass/matter) that produced such an event were, according to the naturalist, self gestated. Therefore Naturalism begins with the paradox of Mass/Matter existing before it was created as it induced its own BIRTH, therefore breaking the first in a long line of laws that must be breeched to allow for the theory of a self induced NATURAL UNIVERSE. Just like the theory that explains the universe being some 93 billion light years across from one polar extreme to the other, but, the declared age of the universe being only 13.7 billion years old...according to the so called evidence of A BIG BANG. http://en.wikipedia.org/Universe

Does it not seem strange that the Universe is actually further across in measured light years than its physical age can allow? Just how could an expanding universe EXPAND faster then the speed of light? Why of course this breech of physical law can be justified in another chalk board theory of relativity as the number's are juggled and another theory, produced between the ears of man, explains "exactly" how expansion can occur faster than any physical law will allow....and it is the religious that base their belief upon unprovable sky magic, NO? When not ONE STAR has NEVER actually been witnessed being born out of the 100 billion galaxies multiplied by the 300 billion stars in each and divided by the age (13.7 billion) of the universe which declares that one star must have been created every 7 min. from the time of the Big Bang forward....that is if one is to believe and accept the voodo science offered as factual and NATURAL(as the naturalist declare that it just to time consuming witnessing the event of a stars birth according to their theory on star birth).....the numbers just do not add up, unless you go into the extrapolated mind of the Naturalist who preaches the formula....Nobody + Nothing = EVERYTHING (Natural Evolution).

The "only" other valid conclusion would be that the universe was a product of CREATION.....completely unacceptable, because this leaves out the ever popular cult of DARWINISM AND THE DARWINIAN CULTISTS, which also exists only in the mind of its followers....because it sure as hell can not be proven, as again ANOTHER LAW OF PHYSICS leaves short the speculations of the SECULAR NATURALIST, for indeed there is no NATURAL LAW OF EVOLUTION to be found anywhere in the journals of ALL NATURAL SCIENCE. BD
Both of these attempts suffer not from their inconsistencies within metaphysics but because they are by nature metaphysical answers. Metaphysics, the understanding of what is real, of what is substantial is a linguistic tool used to help human being cope with their environment. Our metaphysical understanding of space will only grow as we need to understand it better. Your critique and the initial absurdities of the Big Bang theory are not disproofs of our ability to acquire more information and realize more patterns. Instead, they only assert a flaw in the assertion of any metaphysical TRUTH. Instead, to set the philosophical paradigm up so that metaphysics were dedivinized and reduced to the functionality of a simple and limited tool.
Reply With Quote