Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp
Give me one child born from a petri dish. If an embryo is human life and will live unless something is done to end its life, then an embryo in a petri dish should grow into a child than can be removed from the petri dish, slapped on the ass, and given a birth certificate.
|
I have provided ample credible science that states explicitly that unborns at any stage of development are living human beings. You can make your fallacious flat earth argument until the proverbial cows come home but your credibility is lacking. The onus is now upon you to provide some credible science that states explicitly that the offspring of two human beings is at some point, something other than a lving human being. Credible science has been provided and only credible science will serve as a rebuttal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp
Seeds grow into plants, so they must be alive. Embryos don't grow into anything no matter how much you feed and water them, so they aren't living human beings.
|
Do feel free to provide some credible science to support that most childish argument. First you attempt to compare perfectly healthy unborns to those who are so sick or injured that they can't reasonably be expected to recover and now you are attempting to compare a human being to a plant. Your argument has failed mulp. Tuck your tail firmly between your legs and quietly disappear to avoid further embarassment. Your arguments are the same old pro choice logical fallacies that have been losing all along.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp
I might change my mind when you show me evidence of a machine that can take an embryo and deliver an infant nine months later.
|
Typical flat earther. Being shown credible science that states explicitly that you are wrong isn't enough. Now you want to see a machine. Do you realize how stupid that argument is? I am sure that at some point, we will be able to support an unborn from fertilization to delivery in an artifical environment. But nothing will change. The unborn is what it is. If we can support them in an artificial environment, they will still be the same creature they would be if they were in a woman's body. The only difference would be the environment in which they grew. You don't become a different creature because of your envionment. If you accept that a child who grew in an artifical environment is a human being at every stage but the exact same child who grows in a woman's body is not, then your argument has successfully failed on every level.