View Single Post
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 12:13 AM
Qurmudjin's Avatar
Qurmudjin Qurmudjin is offline
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 606
Send a message via ICQ to Qurmudjin Send a message via AIM to Qurmudjin Send a message via MSN to Qurmudjin Send a message via Yahoo to Qurmudjin
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Fatts View Post
All laws are "someone" deciding...get over it. What makes this topic so special?
You were the one who brought it up by making it sound as if we didn't have the right to decide who lives or dies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Fatts View Post
And jumping immediately to the argument about pain, defect, rape, incest, blah, blah, blah. You are arguing from emotion and extremes and it's not what this debate is about. I'm actually pro-choice...just anti-bad argument.
Forgive me, I wouldn't want to suddenly turn the issue of abortion into an emotional and extreme one instead of the dispassionate, purely logical one it has always been.

By the way, only sociopaths make decisions that affect other people's lives without any consideration of human emotion. Some emotions are valid, and some are not. But one must consider them. Saying blah, blah, blah does not suddenly make pain, defect, rape and incest irrelevant matters.

But, here's my simple, non-emotional arguement:

Babies are born from women who already have rights. Women cannot be enslaved by the state to incubate a fetus they do not want to bear.

And, I could use the same due process clause of the 14th Amendment to argue why the mother has the right to take the life of the fetus in her womb, as some have tried to use it to take the life, liberty and property of the mother.
__________________
Hehetchetu. Wa uyun tinkte!
Reply With Quote