Originally Posted by mulp

The problem with your logic is that DDT was never banned. Instead, the approved uses of organochloride compounds was withdrawn for uses where good alternatives existed. The use of these compounds for public health needs, such as malaria and denga, was specifically allowed in the US and in the Stockholm protocols.

And you are also wrong in arguing that DDT was actually effective in stopping the spread of malaria, when it was well documented that the specific vector quickly developed a tolerance for DDT, and could not be controlled by DDT.

Clearly you are making the case that we should believe in global warming because the only argument you can make is by drawing an comparison to a purposeful lie, the lies that DDT was banned and if DDT hadn't been banned no malaria deaths would have occured, when both are lies.