I've read absolutely every single website, AP press, and OPINIONS from every source that I could find. I spent hours trying to get a grasp on the *Oral arguments* that both sides had given. I also paid close attention to each Justices line of questioning to both sides. Now, it appears Justice kennedy is strongly on the side of private citizens owning guns BUT surprises always happen. NONE of the other justices questioning is conclusive to how they might rule.

YES, the argument promoting the gun ban ended with the notion that it was BEST for their community! If indeed that remains the precedent for upholding their right then ALL constitutional Amanedments should be held to the same precedent.


My letter to justice ALITO, was to enforce that my CITY/STATE can also use the 16th Amendment due to financial hardship forcing legislation, due to a recession that it WAS in our best interest to keep more money in the local economy.....


This argument does 2 things. It will require the Supreme court to offer an opinon the either states *Cities can over ride the constituitonal right if it's in the best interest* OR *they have to rule it unconstitutional to prevent ALL AMENDMENTS to be over ruled by any city or state*!

I wanted them to THINK, that if they allow this to happen that their ruling will set a PRECEDENT that ALL constitutional amendments can be cast aside by ANY city or state on the exact same grounds.