Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog
Do you believe that because it has taken you several days of "browsing" LEFT WING blog nonsense just looking for a little toe hole to insert your foot and hold the secular door open and keep "history actual" from slamming it on your foot, that this "childish" display of materialistic IDEOLOGY will do away with the first 200 years of American History? Does anyone really care what the constitutionally "illegal" modern courts have to say? They have forsaken the "standard" upon which the entire constitution and rule of law of this nation was drafted upon.....THE TRANSCENDING AUTHORITY OF THE CREATOR. It indeed is hard to have any power of judicial review on any constitutional intent when the "original" source from which these words were drafted (Blackstone's theory on law) is totally ignored. Thus, any decision of opinion made by the US Supreme Court is "moot" once this reference source was first ignored as it had 'clearly' established precedence previous, thus the entire system is "flawed" due to the apparent attempt to "evolve" away from the original intent made by the founders of this nation and proven very easily by HISTORY ACTUAL, and tradition of example such as placing the hand upon the bible, or the example of TRUSTING GOD presented on our currency. Nothing that you have presented "disproves" the actual history of this nation and as such YOU ARE STILL A SECULAR LIAR and proven as such. And "feel free" to crack open an actual HISTORY BOOK....one that does not have the address of the American Communist Lawyer Union's seal of approval PASTED upon its cover. BD
|
No, it didn't "take me several days...". It's called "working mega amounts of overtime to pay the bills".
Your complete lack of credibility shows as well. That's a wiki entry, hardly a "liberal blog". And I provided a link to the original court document as well.
Also, Blackstone was an English Jurist, his book was concerning English Common Law, and not US Law. And Brewer, the son of missionaries who graduated from a parochial college, was quoting an earlier OPINON, that of a local magistrate who found that the defendant could NOT be charged with blashemy in the US, and was instead charged with inciting a riot, fined, and released. And THAT, young man, is from memory. I could, of course, search for the specific court case, if you would like, as I DID ABOVE to provide you with an accurate entry. Of course you could then claim I was taking "several days of browsing liberal blogs" to your heart's content.
I love how you keep quoting the current motto too, the replacement shoved into place in the 1950's, and not our original Founder created one. Do you even have any idea what that original Motto was? I would be more than happy to educate you on that as well, and also our original Pledge of Allegience if you would like.