Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf_22
I didn't say that particular case was in house.
I don't know what information the professors had that made them automaticly side with the alledged victim. I'm not privy to the thought in their heads.
but I do know its good when a professor makes it clear that they are anti-rape and will defend victims not attackers.
it was the girl who hurt many other actual victims by expanding the myth that most rapes only happen in people's imaginations.
I think it was her and not the professors who caused rape victims to be disbelieved.
|
The lady was lying, it is inaccurate to call her the alledged victim. We know now that she was lying the whole time. Early on it was clear she was lying and yet the eggheads decided that the 3 rich white boys just HAD to be guilty because they were rich and white. Supposedly the victim is crazy which is why she did not face charges for filing a false police report. Crazy is somewhat of a defence. What excuses do the professors have? Arrogance? Stupidity? Gullibility? They should have been smart enough to catch the lies early on. They should have reserved judgement instead of rushing to condemn the young men due to them being rich and white.
You bothered by the fact that early on Jesse Jackson promised the accuser a free college education even if she was lying?
__________________
You don't have to be crazy to be a liberal, but it helps.
"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." JFK
Ask not was you can for your country, ask what your country can do for you. Obama Platform
|