Technological advancement of firearms is the primary source the anti-gun people as evidence to combat the 2nd amendment.

It pains me that no case ever brought before the supreme court has asked for a decision to confirm that *Any and ALL types of weaponry in existance at the time the constitution was ratified shall never be subject of a ban, fees, taxation or any legislation passed onto it*........

A supreme court that would say that would end 99% of all anti-gun legislation. They continue to push for taking the firearms that are exactly what the 2nd amendment protects. They are not passing legislation on taking someones ICBM!