Quote:
Originally Posted by itsplayed
Not sure where you're going here....in Hans Blix's last report to the UN, he underlines numerous unresolved issues related to Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. He may have been against military action, but so what!
As far as Israel goes, why single them out and if you need to ask why they abstained from participating you really haven't a clue.
|
If we're going to refer to Hans Blix last report to the UN we should also consider this part:
"How much time would it take to resolve the key remaining disarmament tasks? While cooperation can and is to be immediate, disarmament and at any rate the verification of it cannot be instant. Even with a proactive Iraqi attitude, induced by continued outside pressure, it would still take some time to verify sites and items, analyse documents, interview relevant persons, and draw conclusions.
It would not take years, nor weeks, but months."
Why couldn't we give him a couple of months more?
I suppose we wanted to get the job done before the heat of summer...how'd that work out?
Mission Accomplished?