View Single Post
  #117 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 06:19 PM
areyoushittin'me?'s Avatar
areyoushittin'me? areyoushittin'me? is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
They are not forcing him, he can accept the punishment in lieu of acting against his "morals". He has the choice. That he (or you) doesn't like the choices is irrelevant. Again, if you don't want to be put in that position, then don't sign the contract.

I know you have said that you agree with that, but that you are still arguing shows that you really don't.

As for a "bullshit" war. Perhaps, but even if this was a noble endeavor that could not be questioned, you would still have a certain % of people who wanted to void their contract. The simple fact is that Congress authorized the President to use "any and all means" and he has. The soldier really has no real argument.

Now if he were drafted, then yes. If Congress refused to support the President, then yes. There are legitimate reasons that one can use to argue for voiding the contract, but not in this case.
Perhaps you should look up the definition of force.

To suggest that agreeing on a point of discussion and then continuing addressing other points of the discussion negates that agreement is absurd...I suppose we should simply end this one here except one last point and that is that I am glad to see that you agree with me regarding the draft...that indicates to me that my point is not totally lost on you...have a good day.
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."

Which side will you be on?


OBAMA/PEROT
Reply With Quote