Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent_Grey
It's between the non-split-tailed "safe" version and the old one.
Here's what I don't get...the original Starbucks logo was both split-tailed AND had bare breasts with nipple showing... the "new" logo is just the same but with hair grown down to cover the breasts. Where was the moral outrage when it actually had nudity on it?
|
It is one of those things that the change brought attention to it. If they had never changed the logo, no one would have ever noticed. But since they changed, someone looking for a little publicity noticed and decided to run with it.