Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent_Grey
It's between the non-split-tailed "safe" version and the old one.
Here's what I don't get...the original Starbucks logo was both split-tailed AND had bare breasts with nipple showing... the "new" logo is just the same but with hair grown down to cover the breasts. Where was the moral outrage when it actually had nudity on it?
|
Yes of course, I missed that. Why, the old split tail does make me run around buying up all the sardines in town and having a bash in the city fountain after dumping in 200 boxes of Morton salt.