Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent_Grey
Ah, a fair point. I suppose I would have to clarify by stating that I may have falsely assumed that BD was arguing from the conservative viewpoint (i.e. Hardcore criminals all get away scot free while hard-working americans are unfairly persecuted for not being Politically correct.)
If my assumption was correct, my statement stands in terms of such a high population of poor minority offenders and low population of white-collar criminals. In a sense, I'm agreeing its unequal, but not in the way I'm assuming BD means.
If however BD is equally appalled at dispreportionate arrest, conviction, and sentancing rates of poor and/or minority offenders, then I don't actually disagree. But I also don't really see what liberalism has to do with it... good liberals tend to advocate preventative and rehabilitative justice over emphasis on hard time, so I don't see how one could lay dispreportionality in the prison population at our feet.
And as for you Takuan SoHo, I'm not sure if you're a true libretarian or not. While I admire libretarians for their consistancy (government out of EVERYWHERE, including the bedroom) I don't tend to agree with their viewpoint, since I believe government can be a positive force in a great many things. At least certainly more than conservatives and libretarians tend to give credit for.
|
Ah...now we are getting to the problem with such a premise as your thread and the prior one of BadMutha's...that is to assume that the terms liberal and conservative actually provide quantifiable absolutes and that further, it is safe to assume that all parties agree on what they are.
Since I cannot speak for BD, I shall leave clarification to him.
All I will say at this time is that our justice system is a joke and much of it is based on who you know and that has nothing to do with being liberal or conservative.