Quote:
Originally Posted by StormanNorman
I can't explain it....I can only theorize based on physical observations.
No, it requires observation....as matter in the universe appears to be moving away from a central point at more or less speeds predicted by the laws of physics. And, Ken, matter can be created and destroyed...that's where the energy in an atomic blast comes from. E=MC^2.
I don't know how life began, Ken....so, I guess I wouldn't have you believe anything. Again, we can theorize...attempt to recreate certain conditions in a lab that may have existed billions of years ago, etc...
|
So I need to have faith and choice to believe that we have a perfect understanding of it.
When you split the atoms you are releasing the energy which is part of the atom. The atoms are not destroyed they are transformed and the energy from joining the atoms together is released. "First Law of Thermodynamics: Energy can be changed from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed. The total amount of energy and matter in the Universe remains constant, merely changing from one form to another. The First Law of Thermodynamics (Conservation) states that energy is always conserved, it cannot be created or destroyed. In essence, energy can be converted from one form into another." Please note the use of Law indicating this considered a scientific fact versus a theory which is and educated guess.
To teach creationism in the form of the Big Bang requires faith, not fact. To teach creationism of God requires faith, not fact. So why is one prohibited in classrooms?
Darwinism is a fine theory, but it cannot explain life. Of course for all we know evolution is God's way of allowing for his creation to adapt without constant micromanaging. Science and religon are not mutally exclusive, except in our government schools that force kids to learn that religon is a myth by excluding it from education.