View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 10:08 AM
crowonapost's Avatar
crowonapost crowonapost is online now
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDelegate#12 View Post
That contract would be seen as unenforcable by the Supreme Court. The democrat party has engaged in a unfair electioneering process by limiting the states who can hold early primaries. Why should voters of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina be given the right to vote before the voters of Michigan and Florida? Why should the voters MI and FL be punished for their states decission to move up the primary?

I'm telling you people something if the party doesn't do something to count these votes Hillary Clinton is going to court to get this settled. Remember she is a lawyer.
The supreme court isn't gong to do shit. Yes it was completely legal & technically not even Iowa is supposed to vote early.

No they broke the rules that simple. Like all your other deluded fantasies this ain't going to change.
__________________
The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.
- Jack Handy
Reply With Quote