Quote:
Originally Posted by Carson
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
Not really a logic issue, outside of applying Occam's razor. If you don't use logic, how are you gonna determine anything about any issue, u can't. You use logic in every word u speak, every step you make, and every post you write.
And the "other gunman" theory has been pretty much debunked. The only place the second gunman could have been had several police officers on the knoll who would have seen it. But as you see they didn't just stop when Oswald admitted he did it, they understood there was a possiblity of a second gunman. Just like there easily could have been other people involved then the actual hijackers who boarded the planes. In fact I guarantee other people were involved. Planning requires other people period.
Also, nearly every test done since then has shown that LH Oswald could have easily accomplished what he did.
Your getting off topic, point is a video of hijackers stating their intentions to blow up the world trade center proves exactly jack shit except that they wanted to blow up the world trade center and were successful. It doesn't prove that they did not receive help from the US government. Like I said at the beginning this is an issue that can not be proved.
|
Because this isn't a logic problem? You are calling for conspiracy, that is outside the realms of logic (because if you can prove it logically, it wouldn't be a conspiracy). Being outside the realm of logic is not necessarily bad, it just means that we don't have complete information, which we seldom do in life.
And of course there were other people. Al Qaeda cells in Europe and Afghanistan helped to plan the operation and paid for it. That Al Qaeda knew of 9/11 in advance is clear by their assassination of the leader of the Northern Alliance on the next day, in an attempt to destroy the only opposition the US could rely on in the region.
That it can't be "proved" is irrelevant. Probability enters into this discussion. You want to go for the least probable explanation, with no evidence to back it up. That is what makes you a loon.