Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent_Grey
My belief when it comes to homosexuality is pretty simple. I assert that as we develop, there are thousands of variables that make up who we are sexually. Some of it can be genetic, some of it psychological, and the rest myriad factors from our environment that cannot be controlled.
The illusion that homosexuality is a choice springs from the fact that certain life events often seem prevalent in the lives of gay people; but it is faulty to think that these variations result in people having significant sway over what, when their sexual makeup is set into a dulthood, will be.
One example is that we have no idea what we will fetishize and what we will simply embrace. Take for instance the case of a child brought up in a strictly religious home, who is beaten every time he displays the lightest hint of homosexuality.
Possibility One, is that he embraces this harsh lesson. Pain=Bad. Homosexuality=Pain. Homosexuality=Bad.
Possibility Two, is that he rejects it out of hand. Perhaps in time he might reject his father. Or he comes to associate a link between Men, Pain, and Sex created by this situation.
The bitch of it is, you have no way of knowing what a young mind will do with any lesson, however harsh or mild its method.
Where I will side against liberals to a small degree in this, is that I do think it's physically possible to change your sexual makeup as an adult. It's just that I don't think that change is in any way desireable
It's possible if you go through one of those Christian conversion camps for instance, that maybe a scant number of attendants will ultimately come to reject homosexuality. I think it's rare, and I think a greater amount of psychological scars come from doing it, but yeah, it is physically possible.
As usual the bigger question remains why is it flat out wrong to be gay? I have never heard a compelling answer on this.
Perhaps someone here has one for me?
|
Being "homosexual" is in fact a form of mental illness and was addressed as such until the early 1970s by all knowledgeable mental health professionals. But due to the lobby efforts of the homosexual community, there has been a re-defining of such. But, in reality, the human mind controls all aspects of ones sexuality as it is indeed a persons "greatest" sexual organ, as pain, pleasure and sexual orientation comes from such cognation of reason as presented in the human mind. Therefore I find that it should be addressed as nothing less than the deviant variation form normal cognation to reason that it represents. But to declare it a normal practice of society is nothing but a political statement grounded in propaganda. And of course if one allows the practice thereof they are breaking the decrees of the creator. Its true that beneath the mask of homosexuality rests a human, and as such they should be considered as nothing less than human, but the practice of that mental orientation is indeed made by "choice" as is any decision to engage in sex in any form, if not, then we are witness to the crime of "rape". No one needs to engage in sex to have continued life existence, therefore it is not of any humanitarian concern in the preservation thereof.
In fact I find all people that practice liberalism to be of a "feminine nature" as they deal with reality in the emotional sphere of their cognation to any mental reasoning. This indeed is why the right of women suffrage did not occur until after the fact of Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law ceased being the reference source to the decisions made by the Supreme Court of these United States. And just as in the noted population of the entire world "feminine ideology" now engulfs upwards of 50% of national politics, after the unconstitutional right to vote was granted women(if it had not been found to be unconstitutional, no amendment would have been needed), in the fact there is a direct decree from the creator that no woman should hold a position of authority over man. Thus, homosexuality is merely another presentation of feminine politics presented to the American public at large, just as is the Nanny State of Communism, the murder of the innocent unborn in the self professed declaration of "female choice" being presented as paramount to even life itself. Just another step that feminine liberalism has led us down in damning our national morality. BD