View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2008, 05:09 AM
wibblyesq's Avatar
wibblyesq wibblyesq is offline
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Waylander View Post
When they engage coalition forces from civilian areas or dressed as civilians - not representing a state and bound by the laws and customs that the state - then they are indeed terrorists, aren't they? Who can be held responsible for their actions? It is their strength, is it not? Very few stand-up fights taking place when we do engage these fuckers.

Words have specific meanings, and being ignorant of the meaning or wishing it had a different one doesn't make one less wrong. People who want to equate terrorists with soldiers are misguided.
They're guerrillas.

Just like the american army in the war for independence, they didn't follow conventional battlefield rules, they didn't have uniforms, they would hit and run...

It's all a matter of perspective.
Reply With Quote