Quote:
Originally Posted by ForReal
Yes, one would think the military would have some avenue of recourse for our fighting troops, maybe even the local humane society could "foster care" his dogs. Then again, maybe the soldier could resolve his own problem by allowing someone else to care for his dogs. Is it really "our" problem?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob
That is what the soldier was trying to do by having his father take care of his dogs.
|
I mean that the soldier should have someone other than his father who has his own dogs care for his dogs since the addition puts his father over the legal limit the city allows.
__________________
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
|