04-10-2008, 05:15 AM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,223
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintMalaclypse
Ah, finally, someone willing to use actual definitions of actual science.
So, let 'er rip, George...show us your definition of human which means you can hear, unless you're a deaf human, and can see, unless you're a blind human, and can touch, unless you're a paralyzed human, and can process those sensations, unless you're under anasthesia, in a coma, are a vegetable, or are just really distracted. There are times when I've been so deep in thought that I'd qualify, under your definition, to be at most 25% human. Probably less.
|
You weren't really expecting an answer were you? It is a feint. They use language that suggests science, but when you try to engage them with actual science, off they go to get as far away from any actual discussion of science as possible.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|