Wolf, you are doing exactly the same thing only to a greater degree. I have looked at your views. Hell, I used to be pro choice. I had a discussion, both philosophical and scientific with someone who really knew his stuff and as a result, I spent more time in medical school libraries doing research than I care to admit. The end result is that I couldn't put together a factual argument that could rationally support pro choice so I switched sides.

I have provided you with all sorts of credible science and rational philosophical arguments. So far, you have not provided even a small bit of science to rebutt the scientific side of the argument and your philosophica arguments are wandering all over the place and yet, you refuse to budge even a bit when it is clear that you are losing.

I have seen all the views, but your view requires that unborns not be living human beings. Why would I accept that view when I can provide medical textbooks, medical journals and any number of books on developmental biolgy that prove you wrong and you can provide no science that says you are right. I have looked at your view and provided evidence to prove it wrong and yet, you continue to hold on to it. Philosopically, how do you justify that?

__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma