View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 04:36 AM
PaleRider's Avatar
PaleRider PaleRider is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sachem View Post
Right. She just carries it for nine months and gives birth for fun. It really isn't part of her and doesn't need her to grow.
It is not part of her and simply suggesting that it is also does not constitute an argument. Your whole position, it seems, is based on logical fallacies. Feel free to validate your argument by providing some credible science that states that the child is part of its mother before it is born.

Neither being inside a thing, nor depending upon a thing makes you a part of a thing.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Reply With Quote