Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
That is called justification.
I guess it is. Since you can't counter it and denial of science hardly constitutes an argument.
What the doctor wrote was a sad and pitiful attempt to asuage his own guilt over what he did. If it were possible, he would have used credible science to simply prove that what he killed was not a living human being. He couldn't, so he turned to genuine mumbo jumbo (metaphysics) in an attempt to relieve his own self loathing.
|
Credible science does not control peoples lives as I said above. I don't know where you get the "guilt" part. Sorry but it didnt' look that way to me. Isn't all science just mumbo jumbo when it comes right down to the line. Do you in all honesty think that every person will and should live their lives according to credible scientific facts?