Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
He is not a murderer and he doesn't need to justify his actions,there's no need to...
|
So why write the piece in the first place?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
The facts speak for themselves.
He did not assist in the death of a "human being" . It was a "potential human being". ie potential bear, wolf , cow, etc.... Do you even know what potential means?
|
Still waiting for you to provide even a small piece of scientific evidence that suggestst that the offspring of two human beings is ever anything but a human being. Did you notice that the "doctor" who was trying to justify his part in killing the child didn't try to use science to prove that he hadn't killed a human being? He attempted to justify his actions based on metaphysics because he knows that the science would prove him wrong in a flash. He got as far away from fact as is humanly possible for a reason.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
|