[quote=OkhamsRazor]
Quote:
|
Remember how expensive the Starr Investigation was... I say lets save ourselves a few bucks...
|
I agree with you now and I agreed with you then (if that is, you were of the same mind back in '98).
Quote:
|
wait for these guys to leave office and then indict the lot of them for their crimes in office.
|
I think that, in the case of the president, it is a MORE difficult hurdle to pass once they are out of office. I am not sure about that though.
Quote:
|
This way, presuming the Democrats gain power, getting the government to give up or declassify relative documents will be far less time consuming and costly.
|
Finally someone puts the horse BEFORE the cart.
Quote:
|
Likewise, credible witnesses will be far more likely to come forward once this administration is out of office.
|
Not if they are politicians. Have you ever read a former (waiting in the wings) politcian's book?
For instance, Rudy G.'s book wasn't really filled with much more than trivial matters. He CAN'T risk saying anything of note.
I think that once they are done completely (Zell Miller) you can start to take what they say or write without a 50# sack of salt.
Quote:
|
Aside from the cost savings, I think we would stand a far better chance at letting the facts guide us to the truth.
|
I like the idea of not needlessly wasting taxpayers money. In the end that was what Starr's investigation came out to.
btw, Keneth Starr was involved in some trickery in trying to defend a death row inmate in California. Seems they faked up a bunch of documents. He didn't personally do it, but he was on the team of whores (lawyers) that allowed it.
Quote:
Just a thought 
|
It is a good thought.
Now go ahead and say how facile my post is, and that it is without any significance or depth you fucker.