View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2007, 12:48 PM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
nathanbforrest45 nathanbforrest45 is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 9,146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wvpeach View Post
You certainly are defending a irrelevant poll started by Badmutha to the extremes aren't you nate?
Hey have fun doing that its a beautiful day here in WV and I think I have better things to do.
Irrelevent? Of course, everything on AWE is irrelevant to anyone except the people on this forum. However, all post are extremely relevent to the forum itself. If only those post you agree with are relevent then we need to change the name of the forum.

My point is the poll does have meaning within the universe of the forum. You don't think that it does since you disagree with it's findings. Any poll has meaning within the confines of the way its constructed. IMHO this poll simply ask if these two were the only choices which would you vote for. Your only choices are Hilliary, Rudy, or nobody since these are your only choices. This is no different than those polls that ask "If the election were held today who would you vote for (a), (b) or (c). Since the election is not being held today and there are more people in the mix than a, b or c would you also say these polls have no meaning or use?

I doubt that anyone thinks Badmutha thought his "poll" would automatically elevate anyone to the office of the presidency, except perhaps you. Maybe we should have poll on that question.
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote