View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2007, 08:44 PM
freedomlover freedomlover is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_King View Post
I almost agree with your point - however -

....... by staying there we are occupying terrorists (that are all fired up)

By staying there, we are creating another generation of terrorists.

whom other wise will get bored and go global to tackle the beast ....

They already have. Globally, terrorism is up. I would also like to point out that there were not "terrorists" Iraq before we invaded AND the people the allegedly attacked us, have rebuilt (and are even stronger in status) than before the Twin Towers came down. Al qaeda, remember them?

.... ANY of you want them in your town?

this is an absurd question. However, what exactly are we doing to keep them out of our towns?


or would it be a bit better to keep them there?

The terrorists we have the most to fear (because they have already proven a penchant for attacking the US) are presently set to take over Pakistan which has nuclear weapons. We aren't "keeping them there", but they are keeping us busy in Iraq.


Remember that they had no problem attacking the global symbol of freedom - the twin towers
Iraq had NOTHING to do with the "war on terror". They did not attack us, they did not bring down the towers. Try the Taliban, Saudi's and Alqaeda.
__________________
http://nwyc.com/
National Write Your Congressman
Reply With Quote