View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:30 AM
Dom1 Dom1 is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clholloway20 View Post
That "insurance plan" also covers "kids" up to 25 years old. Anyone who pays attention to the committe hearings would understand this. I glad to hear he will veto it. It would definately be one of the better parts of his Presidency.

I am glad you posted that. I forgot to mention that part. Even the Democratic pundits on television were talking about this part of the bill which the Dems in Congress knew would cause a veto. They could have passed a bill had they kept it for poor kids under 18, but they had to expand it so they could score some political points. So, is the veto the bad thing or the Dems being willing to play politics with health care for poor children?
Reply With Quote