Quote:
Originally Posted by justme
But why no mention of the Lusitania? What are you hiding?
|
Ahh, now you are getting into the why. The Lusitania was alledgedly sunk by two torpedoes, but experts say that its riveted hull could withstand the torpedo attacks and not sink. Then they tell us that the munitions that were being carried was the cause of the explosion . . . I agree, especially if they had explosives timed to go off down there in the cargo holds to bring the ship down. The Titanic may well have been a trial run on how to bring down a luxury liner and make it look like it sank because of something else completely.
The story gets deeper when we consider the influence of one JP Morgan, financier. He wanted to buy Cunard Shipping, which owned the Lusitania. When the Cunard management found this out they sought out a loan from the government and built two luxury liners, one of which was the Lusitania. With the sinking of the Lusitania, Morgan and his syndicate of Jewish bankers could now buy Cunard (incedentally, Morgan financed the building of the Titanic and received insurance money from it demise). The winners in this deal, JP Morgan and his Jewish bankers.