View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:22 AM
xiayuan123 xiayuan123 is offline
Political Novice
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 28
Thumbs down In the most absurd corner in China, Are they really crazy?

In the most absurd corner in China, Are they really crazy?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Need the dead man be imposed a fine?

They are so deliberate and crazy
The top and down authorities collude and play tricks crazy
Insist not delaying the case.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My name is XIA Yuanfeng, a Chinese citizen living in Liaoyuan City, Jilin Province.

The administrative executive department, which is responsible for handling the accident is not to Remove Criminal Cases to judicial organizations to solve the problem, and plots out responsibility on purpose irregularly. Additionally, they impose responsibility to the victim and force to collect penalty. In recent ten years, I rushed about to appeal to the higher authorities for help in Beijing. However, there is still no just solution.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In traffic accident, there are four circumstances under which the party will not be punished according to the regulation: the third one is that if the party dies in the accident, the party will not be charged with the penal and administration responsibility. That is whether the party has peccancies in the accident and whether the party has responsibility for the accident, he will not be given penal or administration sanctions.
The third item of the thirty-third article in Constitution of the People's Republic of China writes the nation respects and ensures human rights.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After the criminal happened, the handling traffic department didn’t impose any criminal and administrative punishment to the troublemaker who killed a person because of the traffic accident, nor detained the troublemaker even only one day. What it did was setting the criminal free. Because I couldn’t accept the decision sentenced by the Ministry of Public Security, I went to Beijing to appeal to higher authorities for help. To my surprise, I was detained by the authority and had labor education and then detained again.

A relative of the peacebreaker said in the office of accident ministry: We just bumped a person to death! It is not a big matter!

On the lantern festival 2005, the head of letters and visitors office from Public Security Bureau of People’s Republic of China came to Liaoyuan City in order to coordinate this case, and he said the troublemaker should be responsible for All responsibility of Decision on Re-ascertainment of Liability for Traffic Accident should be changed and investigated. However, until now, there is no effect, even though I have gone to Beijing to appeal to the higher authorities for several times.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I: They are so deliberate and crazy
On four o’clock forty on the afternoon of November 13th, 1998, at the place one meter west from the center of the crossing of a road junction, less than 200 meters from the north of Liaoyuan City Mining Bureau General Hospital, where (it is said by the criminal that) the visibility was two to three hundred meters and had good sight and open zone, because Xu Shaoqi, a resident of Sun Rising Rural of Lighthouse Village in Xi’an District, Liaoyuan City, was drunk driving and over speeding and driving conversely (according to the fact that the victim did not have traces that showed being hit on his body and the position of the hitting point on the body of the bike, it can be proved that Xu was truly driving conversely on the left driveway. This fact has been testified.) when the two speeding Ji D-50813 South 125 B-side two-wheel motorcycles hit my older sister Xia Lianqun (hereinafter referred to as the victim) who was passing the road normally pushing a bike and bumped her far to more than ten meters, Xu did not take any measures and looked on with folded arms. His subjective hostility is evident. He deliberately dragged on for nearly one hour and then sent the victim to the hospital which is only two hundred meters away from the crime scene. Because the lunatic criminal wished the victim died and deliberately dragged on without aids for the victim the victim died from the excessively bleeding. Xu Shaoqi knew clearly that the victim could die if he gave no curing measures. His subjective hostility is one important element of murder.
Traffic accident and giving no aids are in the same process of Xu Shaoqi’s crime. The main reason of victim’s death is that Xu did not adopt necessary curing measures.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II: Accident disposal authority evaded laws
The authority did not punish the criminals but punish the unaccountable victim (forcibly imposed responsibilities on her). The perpetrator hit the pedestrian but got no punishment! Why are the two serious peccancies of after drink and over speed written into the Road Traffic Accident Advisor? Why to amerce the dead victim?
In traffic accident, there are four circumstances under which the party will not be punished according to the regulation: the third one is that if the party dies in the accident, the party will not be charged with the penal and administration responsibility. That is whether the party has peccancies in the accident and whether the party has responsibility for the accident, he will not be given penal or administration sanctions.

There is a clear and definite regulation in How to presume the traffic accidents because of drunk- driving, if the accident was made by the drunk- driving, the driver should be responsible for the accidents.

In Nov. 30, 1998, the professional executing authority the accident disposal unit of Liaoyuan City traffic police detachment (hereinafter referred to as the accident unit) issued the NO. 2110153 Road Traffic Accident Responsibility Cognizance which says that the accident perpetrator drove speeding after drinking and made the victim die. But the authority deliberately exculpated for the criminal and unlawfully judged that the criminal should take the subordinate responsibility and forcibly imposed on the decedent in the accident main responsibility and gave the victim one hundred Yuan penalty according to the NO.2110153 Road Traffic Accident Responsibility Cognizance.
The accident unit officiates in deputy of the nation. The head of the accident unit Zhang said, The responsibility partition of the accident is studied and made by our whole community
The third item of the thirty-third article in Constitution of the People's Republic of China writes the nation respects and ensures human rights. The police department defied and trampled human rights and forcibly imposed responsibility on the victim and gave the victim penalty of one hundred Yuan. Who can say the behavior lacking consciousness is the safeguard of human right?
Reply With Quote