Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689
This is the red herring that Cat's Meow threw out a long time ago in this thread.
Where did he ever say that he was a "strict constructionist" or any other kind of constructionist for that matter?
|
You seem to have some 'train wrecks' of your own...
Hmmm...you are the one who posted the article and the proof is right here, read your own first post to the thread again...the following is from the SFC article quoting him in South Carolina:
Quote:
|
McCain also vowed that if elected, he would appoint judges who "strictly interpret the Constitution of the United States and do not legislate from the bench."
|
This is clearly rhetoric of a constructionist. Do you even know what a constructionist is at this point? Look at the phrase in
bold type!
Quote:
|
Opposing Roe v. Wade hardly qualifies one as a constructionist.
|
The idea of the 'activist judge' clearly qualifies a person as a constructionist. It is a bunch of jingoistic crap that that people throw up when cornered...
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689
The main point of this thread in my view {Cat's Meow"} is the dishonesty in which the San Francisco Chronicle dealt with the headline.
|
Dishonesty...
You might not like a pro-choice view but it is not dishonest in what they reported.